Sunday 27 February 2011

            The people of today are controlled by this particular symbol. They seem obsessed with it, sometimes they subconsciously laugh at it, sometimes they frantically move it from side to side, and sometimes they slide their fingers on a surface bounded by a box that does not seem to be the same as the other surfaces. This is a symbol of power – the bitten apple.

            Macbooks, ipods, iphones and ipads are a few of the products from Apple Inc. that have become one of the most fashionable commodities to buy. Often claimed to be the slimmest, the lightest with its modern and simplistic designs making Apple Inc. products one of the hottest commodities in the market. Not only in our local context, that the iphone and the ipad has become part of the popular culture and the latest trend. Even Barack Obama, the president of the United States has complimented Steve Jobs on his “revolutionary products”. Apple Inc. have become a cultural phenomenon in many parts of the world, the bitten apple has become an icon that the world can recognize.







The secret that lies behind commodities.

They are exchanged within the commodity market and as Marx (1867) has analyzed, they have exchange values and use-values. On the surface level, these Mac-products have exchange values in monetary terms and the use-value, the usefulness of the product towards a consumer, seems like an inherent and natural property of the product – the commodity fetish. In addition, people evaluate their efforts of their own labor as a personal issue but in actual fact, it is a social relation between each other, between objects. As we can see behind the monetary terms, lies the objectification of abstract human labor. The way we valuate the product is often based on the amount of human labor that is required to produce it and thus, human labor is being sold as part of these commodities but consumers often do not realize this fact. Consumers think that the act of purchasing these products are of their own desire and willingness to pay a particular price that they think is ‘worth’ to pay for the product. Little did they know the way they are involved in the market are being controlled by the social creation of values that is created from such objectification human labor and the commodity fetishism, treating commodities to have a ‘natural value’.

            We, as consumers in the commodity exchange are subconscious of ourselves being emerged and controlled by this system. We subconsciously sustain the system of labor as a commodity, as we believe that we are free labors who have the freedom to choose how to use our own labor. We believe that our human labor belongs to us but unfortunately when we sell our human labor, it becomes a commodity. By continuing our usual practices causes the sustenance of the entire system. (Zizek, 1989) The person you see at the next table furiously typing on his Macbook is a perpetrator of such a system, he bought the commodity, labor. The boundaries of an individual become expanded and unclear (Deleuze and Guattari, 1983), the consumer of that Macbook also bought a part of that individual that sold his labor to produce that particular product. If the consumer chose to buy the Macbook over any other laptops because of the way it looks, the consumer bought the human labor from the designer of the Macbook.
           

The sign and the signified

            When the person opposite you is using a Macbook, all you see is the brightly lit icon of the bitten apple. When a person holds an iphone up to his or her ear in conversation, you see a shiny silver bitten apple. The Macbook user could be listening music or surfing the Internet, the iphone user may seem to be enjoying the conversation or may be entertained by the device. The bitten apple icon is linked to these leisure activities. Without the signified, the bitten apple is only a shape. The sign and the signified (Sassure), the bitten apple as the sign and it signifies the upper class popular culture and their lifestyle.


Youtube Video of an Iphone Advertisement

The travel application that is available on the iphone is suggesting that the owners of iphone can afford the enjoyment of traveling and can afford the lifestyle of the upper class. Due to the link between the sign and the signifier, people consume the culture that the symbol seems to bring. The symbol motivates the consumers to purchase from Apple Inc.


Why do you want to consume such products?

            This brings us to why the consumption of the symbol is of importance to consumers. Veblen (1895) explains that this is due to emulation. The hierarchy of class and status in our society motivates us to desire to emulate upwards and we want to show off that emulation. In other words, people want to show off what they have earned to show their belonging to the upper class, in Veblen’s words - the ‘leisure class’, and the leisure class have a taboo of labor. For Veblen, the totem is the body and people want to emulate the bodies of those who already belong in the ‘leisure class’. Till today, Apple products are cost relatively higher than the other options that run on windows systems. For example, the cheapest laptop at dell would cost $699 where else the cheapest Macbook costs $1348. The price of the Macbook is almost double the price of the Dell laptop. Thus, to choose to buy a Macbook over a Dell computer would make the consumer seem like he or she has the wealth to consume luxury products, therefore closer to belonging to what Veblen calls, the ‘leisure class’.

People buy the bitten apple symbol to show their relation with the leisure class and to place themselves as far away from the laboring class as possible. The body as treated like an object, controlling the body to behave in certain ways in order to emulate the ‘leisure class’. This questions if people are consuming the technology or the symbol. The desire to emulate can motivate people to consume and that is the power of the sign.
           

Think again.

            If you think you are the one in control, as consumers, as the people with the monetary power and choice, think again. Horkheimer and Adorno (1999) has shown how products can define the consumer and not the other way around as we often imagine it to be. As explained above, you can see how the symbol on the bitten apple can be in control of how the consumer thinks. The bitten apple symbol can motivate consumers to desire products from Apple Inc. The control of consumption and production does not belong to the consumer as we often assume it to be. “The iphone sells to a niche market based on its iconic status rather than its features.” (The Straits Times, Alfred Siew, 2007) We can see that it is not its advance technological features that motivates people to consume their products. Just the bitten apple logo on anything might do the trick. This is the power of the bitten apple. 




9 comments:

  1. Before apple became commercialized, it was really quite an exclusive product not only due to its price, but also to its use as a device for those in the creative industry. Windows won in both price and practicality (there were a lot more programs developed for the PC) but Apple had an edge. This edge is in their branding and what Michele has called the “sign of the bitten apple” (it’s quite catchy!).

    In those days before the first iPod was made, everyone admired the Macintosh user because it was so exclusive. Someone who owned a Macintosh computer showed both distinction and his ability to afford a product that was associated with non-productive labour (art and design). This is very closely in line with Veblen theory of conspicuous consumption.

    Today, Apple products continue to be admired and sought after (just look at those queues every morning outside Singtel!). But I believe this is so for a very different reason. Apple products are no longer as exclusive – they are everywhere and while it is still more expensive than a Dell computer, it is a lot more affordable than previously. But it is because it is everywhere that people feel pressurized to conform to the norm. Its status has changed from something few possess to something everyone should possess. I know of people who proclaim their love for Apple and yet cannot give me any solid reasons why they love their products.

    I believe that Apple has come a long way then, to revise its status from a sign of the leisure class to one that signifies being part of the middle class.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it spot on that you identify Apple products as the pinnacle of the commodity fetish in today's world.

    My question would be, then, what makes Apple 'more popular' than, say Windows? One of the assumptions here is that that is even the case…

    Aren't all companies doing their best to turn their products into fetishes? What's so special about Apple? All phones and computers signify leisure, no? What I mean is, I think that there's more to it than pricing and the way it looks, if not every computer maker can just jack up prices - and there are some very good-looking Windows laptops around. I think the role of branding and design (which encompasses far more than just good looks) cannot be overstated.

    I think Apple brand itself first as efficient and substantial, then as beautiful/luxurious. The minimalist design in their products and advertisements show that Apple loves to 'trim the fat', remove the right click, make a laptop with one single unibody… I could go on. All excess is abhorred. The aluminum in their products (versus plastic), the widespread use of touch input - Apple is a brand that is very much tactile, sensual and immediately material in nature. And I believe these factors play a huge role in the construction of Apple's products as fetishes.

    (Another point about Apple products as commodity fetish - that's why most people either love or hate them. Reverence the father, or kill him…)

    -Hao Guang

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello there

    I did on Apple Inc too! I like your point on semiotics. I do agree with you that the Apple symbol is a sign and its signifier is wealth.

    I would like to add on to this idea. I believe, when it comes to the i-phone, the sign is the phone itself. The signifier is the branding. But, the signified is ambiguous.

    And it is purposely ambiguous because Apple is smart and they want the i-phone to cater to everyone so that they have a larger consumer base. That's when the apps comes in right. It allows room for individuality.

    So, yes, you need money to buy the i-phone. but if it is only supposed to cater to the rich, the sales of the phone wouldn't be so much. I mean, how many rich people can there be right?

    And yes, Veblen's conspicuous consumption and emulation comes in. but my point is, the signified is strategically ambiguous. In doing so, Apple cleverly acknowledges consumers agency. They know that the consumer can think. But, what they do to safeguard their commodities is that the narrow down the options for the consumers. Making it seem like a duh! to purchase Apple.

    What do you think? :) and Hao Guang, I agree with you too! Apple is the epitome of the commodity fetish. I don't remember any other brands that have such cult followings.

    -Nadiah

    ReplyDelete
  4. hi nadiah, regarding on your comment that the iphone is still affordable to many and thus may not be catered to the rich, i feel that the prices are not catered to the rich, but the image is.

    they provide that image that the rich will use the iphone, e.g. the travelling apps. thus, this signifier is link to the signified, the apple symbol. and thus people can afford but think that they are buying something that will promote their status and thus will consume to emulate the upper class. but that doesn't mean that they cannot afford it.

    perhaps you are confused when i compared the prices of the macbook versus the dell laptop. what i was trying to bring across was that people buy mac products to becomes the 'leisure class' and how in comparison between companies in terms of prices, although apple products often having higher prices (even iphone is more expensive than many other phones), people buy them because they want to belong to this 'leisure class'.

    thanks for commenting!
    made me happy that people actually will choose my article to read (:

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello, Michele (: I feel attuned with your blogpost, because I own an iPhone, albeit an outdated version by today's standards. lol

    I just want to address your point on how "people buy the bitten apple symbol to show their relation with the leisure class and to place themselves as far away from the labouring class as possible". Well, I personally don't feel that we as modern consumers of material culture quite fit into the description of Veblen's 'leisure class'. 'Leisure class' has connotations of 'idleness' and how labour becomes the taboo. Yet, majority of the people today who use iPhones, MacBooks or any other apple products are literally 'working people'. Even the middle class or highly-paid professionals are sellers of their own labour and they work hard for a living. Labour, in the sense, does not refer to physical, manual, tedious or menial labour. Instead, it is exemplified in the form of wisdom, knowledge, skills and expertise which they exchange for an income. But it is nevertheless 'work' and 'labour' which is so despised/reviled in Veblen's framework.

    From my perspective, the 'leisure class' does seem rather incompatible with contemporary notions of 'middle class' or 'working professionals'. Yet, it is this category of people that forms one of Apple's largest consumer base. Just a side note as well: iPhone/MacBook is not only used for entertainment purposes (games, music, surfing internet); but it is often utilized as an important tool for communication, data storage and other functions in the course of 'work'.

    I do not know whether Veblen's idea of the 'leisure class' can aptly capture the traits and qualities of the 'middle class' we see today--these people are rather enslaved in my opinion. We just don't seem to have the same kind of luxury to be so free, idle and focus our efforts on conspicuous consumption solely. This is something that struck me after reading your blogpost. Hope this helps! (:

    -Wei Ting

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey I posted a comment ytd dunno why it is gone now. Something about the sociology of sociology that three people chose to do on this topic as analysis, and bringing in the point of apple products becoming the signified instead of just the signifier, and creating not a emulation strata but homogenous binary divide, two great hostile camps facing each other, of those who owns an iphone and those who own other kinds.

    Dont really rmb what I wrote to reproduce it...its sad...and the deadline is gone. Arghhh

    ReplyDelete
  7. I couldn't agree more with your post, Apple is feeding a nation of people who are driven by "keeping up with the Jones'", so to speak. This society of conspicous consumption leads to social status, which, is visible in nearly everything we buy nowadays. Apple is by far not the only company to indulge in such practices of planned and percieved obsolescence, but they are an excellent example of how to make millions from it. Funnily enough I have written a post in retaliation to Apple products, have a look if you like and see if you agree. http://laurenhub.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/they-should-give-you-bin-with-your-next.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. I appreciate your work, the post is really helpful. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. It’s some pretty great info, I appreciate the information you provided is excellent post.
    Hire iPhone Developer

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here is Mr Benjamin contact Email details,lfdsloans@outlook.com. / lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com Or Whatsapp +1 989-394-3740 that helped me with loan of 90,000.00 Euros to startup my business and I'm very grateful,It was really hard on me here trying to make a way as a single mother things hasn't be easy with me but with the help of Le_Meridian put smile on my face as i watch my business growing stronger and expanding as well.I know you may surprise why me putting things like this here but i really have to express my gratitude so anyone seeking for financial help or going through hardship with there business or want to startup business project can see to this and have hope of getting out of the hardship..Thank You.

    ReplyDelete